Determining an orientation direction of a color edge at a pixel location in a color image

ABSTRACT

What is disclosed is a system and method for determining an orientation direction of a color edge at a given pixel location in a binary color image. The orientation direction of the color edge is determined from eight pixel counts with each pixel count being a total number of pixels in each of eight regions of a window centered about a candidate pixel which resides along the color edge. The eight regions are associated with 8 compass points. The orientation of the edge is determined by a 1 st , 2 nd  and 3 rd  tier control bits which are based upon the pixel counts of each region. The 1 st , 2 nd  and 3 rd  tier control bits collectively form a 3-bit word. The 3-bit word defines the orientation direction. The teachings hereof provide an efficient way of performing binary edge orientation detection by making uses of intermediate results to simultaneously encode the edge orientation.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present patent application is a continuation-in-part of co-pendingand commonly owned U.S. Publication No. 2011/0243429, entitled “ColorTrapping On A Halftoned Bi-level Bitmap”, (U.S. application Ser. No.12/754,096), which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.This application is related to concurrently filed and commonly ownedU.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/426,308.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is directed to systems and methods for qualifyingcolor pixels for color trapping on a halftoned bi-level bitmap of acolor image in an image processing system.

BACKGROUND

When printing, for example, using a color inkjet printer, the color isapplied at once to the paper. Each color generally ends up where it isexpected. When printing, in commercial printing presses, a documentconsisting of more than one color of ink requires that the single pagepass through the printing press multiple times as each color is appliedto the paper. Sometimes the paper or the plates applying the ink shift.It might be a tiny shift but sufficient to be noticeable. For example, awhite gap may appear between a cyan letter that is supposed to betouching a magenta box. When this happens, the color is said to beout-of-register. Color-to-color misregistration refers tomisregistration between color separations in a printed image.Misregistration in printed halftoned images can result in image defectssuch as, for instance, white gaps between a two color edge.

One general approach for correcting for misregistration is to expand oneof the abutting regions' separations to fill the misregistration borderregion with a color determined to minimize the visual effect whenprinted. Borders or edges that have been expanded from a region of onecolor to a region of another color, in this manner, are said to be“spread”, i.e., the submissive color is spread into an area of thedominant color. A border which has been expanded is referred to as a“trap”. The zone within which color has been added is called the “trapzone”. Misregistration of colors in a printing device can, in manyinstances, be compensated for by a process often referred to as“trapping” which is a term of art used to describe a hardware and/orsoftware process for compensating for a small amount that the papertends to wander as it travels through the print system. Trappingcompensates for mechanical shifts or stretching of paper or plates inthe printing process and provides an overlap of colors to preventunprinted paper from showing in the final printed product. This is notto be confused with the terms “wet trapping” or “dry trapping” which areterms used to describe behaviors between inks or between ink and paper.Trapping helps preserve the integrity or the shape of an image such asblock serifs. Without trapping, unsightly gaps may be visible betweentwo colors that are supposed to be touching. With trapping, one color ismade to overlap the other by extending that color into a surroundingarea. This allows the colors to keep touching one another, even as thepaper wanders.

Trapping is often accomplished with features built into softwarealgorithms devoted to trapping methods. Many commercial printing devicesperform a trapping method. In many systems, applications for colortrapping require edge detection be performed and an orientationdirection of that edge determined. U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/754,096, entitled: “Color Trapping On A Halftoned Bi-Level Bitmap”,by Meng Yao, (U.S. Publication No. 2011/0243429), discloses a binarycolor detection algorithm which checks the orientation of edges ofdifferent color planes at a pixel locations in the bi-level bitmap.While this algorithm produces robust results, edge orientationdetermination is complicated and expensive to implement.

Accordingly, what is needed in this art is a system and method fordetermining an orientation direction of a color edge at a given pixellocation in a halftoned color image which provides a cost-effectivesolution that can be readily implemented in hardware to enable theintegration of sophisticated image processing techniques into low costprint devices.

BRIEF SUMMARY

What is disclosed is a system and method for determining an orientationdirection of a color edge at a given pixel location in bi-level bitmapof a halftoned color image. The total number of pixels of a given colorare counted in each of eight regions of a window centered about a pixelof interest. The eight regions of the window are associated with thepoints of a compass, i.e., {N, E, S, W, NE, SW, NW, SE}. In a mannermore fully disclosed herein, 1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd) tier control bitsare obtained which collectively form a 3-bit word that defines theorientation. The teachings hereof provide an efficient way ofdetermining binary edge strength and orientation by making uses ofintermediate results created in calculating a maximum pixel count of allthe regions in the window to simultaneously encode the orientation ofthe edge. Advantageously, hardware resource savings are achieved which,in turn, enable the integration of sophisticated image processingtechniques into lower-cost print devices.

In one embodiment, the present method for determining an orientationdirection of a color edge at a given pixel location in a color imageinvolves the following: Eight pixel counts are received with each pixelcount comprising a total number of pixels of a color in a region of awindow centered on a selected pixel in a bi-level bitmap of a halftonedcolor image. Each of the eight window regions is associated with anorientation direction relative to the selected pixel. In one embodiment,the orientation directions correspond to the 8 points of a compass,given by: {N, NE, E, SE S, SW, W, NW}. The pixel counts are compared. Aresult of each comparison produces a 1^(st) tier control bit used toselect a largest pixel count for each pair. The four largest pixelcounts are compared to each other. The result of each comparisonproduces a 2^(nd) tier control bit used to select a highest pixel countfor each pair. The two highest pixel counts are compared against eachother. The result of this comparison produces a 3^(rd) tier control bitused to select a maximum pixel count for this pair. The maximum pixelcount is the greatest pixel count of this color of all the regions ofthe window. The two 2^(nd) tier control bits are used to select two ofthe four 1^(st) tier control bits. The 3^(rd) tier control bit is usedto select one of the two 1^(st) tier control bits and one of the two2^(nd) tier control bits. The final 1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd) tiercontrol bits form a 3-bit word which, in turn, determines theorientation direction for the color edge.

A system for determining an orientation direction of a color edge at agiven pixel location in a color image is also disclosed. In oneembodiment, the system comprises a first set of four comparators. Eachof these comparators receives, as input, two total pixel counts. Each ofthe 8 pixel counts defines a total number of pixels of a color in aregion of a window centered on a selected pixel in a bitmap of ahalftoned color image. These four comparators generate, as a result ofeach comparison, a 1^(st) tier control bit. A total of four 1^(st) tiercontrol bits are produced by this first set of four comparators. Each ofthe four 1^(st) tier control bits is used to select a larger of twopixel counts as output. A total of four larger pixel counts areproduced. The system further comprises a second set of two comparators.Each of these two comparators compares two of the four larger pixelcounts produced as by the first four comparators. These two comparatorsgenerate, as a result of each comparison, a 2^(nd) tier control bit. Atotal of two 2^(nd) tier control bits are produced by this second set oftwo comparators. These two 2^(nd) tier control bits are used to selectthe two highest pixel counts of the first four larger pixel counts. Athird comparator compares the two highest pixel counts produced asoutput by the second set of two comparators and generates, as a resultof this comparison, a 3^(rd) tier control bit. The 3^(rd) tier controlbit is used to select a larger of the two highest pixel counts from thelast two comparator results. This pixel count is the highest pixel countfor all of the eight regions of the window centered on the candidatepixel. Each of the two 2^(nd) tier control bits is used to select two ofthe four 1^(st) tier control bits. The 3^(rd) tier control bit is usedto select one of the two 1^(st) tier control bits and one of the two2^(nd) tier control bits. The selected remaining 1^(st), 2^(nd) and3^(rd) tier control bits collectively comprise a 3-bit word whichdefines the orientation direction of the color edge.

Many features and advantages of the above-described method will becomereadily apparent from the following detailed description andaccompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other features and advantages of the subject matterdisclosed herein will be made apparent from the following detaileddescription taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, inwhich:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example color image shown as a gray level image;

FIG. 2 illustrates an example 7×7 window labeled in row/column formatwhere R_(x) indicates row index and C_(y) indicates column index, wherex and y are in the range from 0 to 6, in the 7×7 image subsection ofFIG. 1;

FIGS. 3A-B show the window of FIG. 2 divided into north and southregions (FIG. 3A) and divided into east and west regions (FIG. 3B);

FIGS. 4A-B show the window of FIG. 2 divided into northwest andsoutheast regions separated (FIG. 4A) and divided into southwest andnortheast regions (FIG. 4B);

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram which illustrates one example embodiment of thepresent method for determining an orientation direction of a color edgeat a given pixel location in a color image;

FIG. 6 is a continuation of the flow diagram of FIG. 5 with flowprocessing continuing with respect to node A;

FIG. 7 illustrates a 1^(st) tier circuit portion wherein various aspectsof the flow diagrams are performed;

FIG. 8 illustrates a 2^(nd) tier circuit portion wherein various aspectsof the flow diagrams are performed;

FIG. 9 illustrates a 3^(rd) tier circuit portion wherein various aspectsof the flow diagrams are performed;

FIG. 10 illustrates the circuit portions of FIGS. 7, 8, and 9 combined;and

FIG. 11 illustrates a block diagram of one example special purposecomputer for implementing one or more aspects of the present method asdescribed with respect to the flow diagrams of FIGS. 5 and 6 and thecircuit configurations shown and discussed with respect to theembodiments of FIGS. 7-10.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

What is disclosed is a system and method for determining an orientationdirection of a color edge at a given pixel location in a bi-level bitmapof a halftoned color image. In a manner more fully disclosed herein, theorientation direction of the color edge is determined from eight pixelcounts with each pixel count being a total number of pixels in each ofeight regions of a window centered about a candidate pixel which residesalong the color edge.

It should be understood that one of ordinary skill in this art would bereadily familiar with many facets of color science such as, but notlimited to, color space, raster image processing, raster graphics,bi-level bitmaps, halftones and halftoning methods, and other techniquesgenerally known in the color science arts.

NON-LIMITING DEFINITIONS

A “pixel” refers to the smallest segment into which an image can bedivided. Pixels of an input image are associated with a color valuedefined in terms of a color space, such as color, intensity, lightness,brightness, or some mathematical transformation thereof. A pixel is an“adjacent pixel” if it immediately borders a given pixel.

A “bitmap” is a grid of pixels generally characterized by a width andheight of the image in pixels and by the number of bits-per-pixel whichdetermines the number of colors a pixel can represent, i.e., color depthof the bitmap.

“Edge detection” is to a method for identifying areas in an image atwhich the image changes or has discontinuities. The edge created by aborder between a region of magenta and a region would be a cyan-magentaedge. This is referred to as a two color edge.

A “two-color edge” has a side of a first color and a side of a secondcolor. In a four-color CMYK device, the two-color edge may be, forinstance, a cyan-magenta edge, a cyan-yellow edge, a magenta-yellowedge, or any color which borders black, for example, a black-cyan edge.If the two-color edge is a cyan-magenta edge then the first side of thetwo-color edge would be an area of the bitmap dominated by the firstcolor, i.e., cyan, and the second side of the two-color edge would be anarea dominated by the second color, i.e., magenta. Edges tend to producevisible artifacts caused by misregistration or print engine artifacts.Artifacts along cyan-yellow edges or magenta-yellow edges tend to beless visible due to the low visibility of yellow. A “cyan edge pixel” onthe cyan side of a cyan-magenta edge can be a cyan pixel or any colorwhich is not magenta and does not contain magenta such as, for example,a white pixel can be a cyan edge pixel along a cyan-magenta edge.Likewise, a “magenta edge pixel” is a pixel on the magenta side of acyan-magenta edge. A magenta edge pixel can be a magenta pixel or anyother color that is not cyan and does not contain cyan.

“Dominant” and “Submissive” colors. Generally, darker or stronger colorstend to be dominant colors and lighter or weaker colors tend to besubmissive colors. A submissive color is less visible when spread intoan area of a dominant color than if a dominant color is spread into anarea of submissive color. Cyan is considered a dominant color and yellowis considered a submissive color. Submissive colors tend to change whiledominant colors tend to remain unchanged. For example, cyan tends toremains unchanged when a submissive yellow is spread outward into thearea where these two colors come into contact. When a dominant color issurrounded by a submissive color, the object represented by the dominantcolor is said to be “choked” because it gets smaller due to the invasionof the submissive color. Conversely, when a submissive color issurrounded by a dominant color, the submissive color gets “spread” intothe surrounding dominant color. There are many ways of determiningwhether a given color is dominant or submissive. A color's weight, orluminosity, can be used to determine whether that color is dominant orsubmissive. For example, R, G, B components can be used determine acolor's relative darkness by an application of the following:Luminosity=(0.3*R)+(0.5*G)+(0.11*B).

Since various aspects of color perception are subjective, it issuggested that trapping decision tables be implemented and the colorsadjusted for specific situations.

A “windoW” of size n×m, where n and m are greater than 1, forms a griddefining a neighborhood of pixels around a selected. A 7×7 window isshown in FIG. 2 that is centered about a pixel labeled “X”. The windowdoes not have to be a square, i.e., n≠m. The size of the window may beadjusted based upon a distance (in pixels) the selected pixel is from acolor edge. As discussed herein further, the window is centered about aselected pixel of interest and partitioned into a plurality of regionseach having a respective orientation direction relative to that pixel.

“Orientation direction” refers to the location of a particular region ofa partitioned window relative to a pixel which is centrally located in awindow placed around that pixel. There are eight orientation directionscorresponding to the compass points: {N, E, S, W, NE, SW, NW, SE}. Eachof these 8 points corresponds to a 3-bit word: ‘000’=N, ‘001’=S,‘010’=W, ‘011’=E, ‘100’=NW, ‘101’=SE, ‘110’=SW, and ‘111’=NE.

A “total pixel count” is a count of the total number of pixels of agiven color that reside in each region of the window.

Example Color Image

FIG. 1 illustrates an example color image 102 shown as a gray levelimage. Subsection 103 represents a small section cut from image 102.Subsection 104 represents an even smaller portion of subsection 103.Subsection 104 illustrates the individual pixels (cells) of a window ofpixels. It should be appreciated that image subsection 104 is not toscale. It should also be appreciated that the sections and subsectionsof FIG. 1 are illustrative and are provided for explanatory purposes.

Example Window Partitioned into Regions

The following assumes a CMYK device capable of printing: cyan, magenta,yellow, and black, on white paper. The bitmap image has already beenhalftoned and information regarding the halftone screens used tohalftone the image have been preserved. The color of each pixel in thedrawings is shown in parenthesis. A pixel labeled ‘(M)’ represents amagenta pixel. A pixel labeled ‘(C)’ represents a cyan pixel. The label‘(W)’ refers to a white pixel where no color was applied to that pixellocation, i.e., the resulting white is from the white paper. Theselected pixel of interest is shown positioned at the center of thewindow and labeled ‘X’.

Reference is next being made to the window 200 of FIG. 2 which has 7rows and 7 columns of pixels. Each pixel in the 7×7 window has arow/column index associated with that pixel location, i.e., R_(x)C_(y)where x=0 . . . 6, and y=0 . . . 6. The top row is row 0 and the bottomrow is row 6. The left-most column is column 0 and the right-most columnis column 6. By way of example, the magenta (M) pixel (at 202) in theupper left corner of the window 200 has row/column index R₀C₀. The white(W) pixel (at 204) in the lower right corner has row/column index R₆C₆.Using row/column indexing, pixels corresponding to each of the eightorientation directions associated with the 8 compass points are asfollows:

North (R_(x)<3)

Northeast (C_(y)>R_(x))

East (C_(y)>3)

Southeast (R_(x)+C_(y)>6)

South (R_(x)>3)

Southwest (C_(y)<R_(x))

West (C_(y)<3)

Northwest (R_(x)+C_(y)<6)

In FIG. 3A, the 7×7 window 200 of FIG. 2 is shown divided into a top andbottom region separated by a row of shaded pixels containing theselected pixel of interest labeled (X). The top region 302 is the northregion, i.e., where pixels have a row index of (R_(x)<3). The number ofwhite (W) pixels in the north region is 7. The number of cyan (C) pixelsin the north region is 11. The number of magenta (M) pixels in the northregion is 3. The bottom region 303 is the south region, i.e., wherepixels have a row index of (R_(x)>3). The number of white (W) pixels inthe south region is 8. The number of cyan (C) pixels in the south regionis 8. The number of magenta (M) pixels in the south region is 5.

In FIG. 3B, the 7×7 window 200 of FIG. 2 is shown divided into a leftand right region separated by a column of shaded pixels containing theselected pixel of interest labeled (X). The left region 304 is the westregion, i.e., where pixels have a column index (C_(y)<3). The number ofwhite (W) pixels in the west region is 1. The number of cyan (C) pixelsin the west region is 10. The number of magenta (M) pixels in the westregion is 10. The right region 305 of the window is the east region,i.e., where pixels have a column index (C_(y)>3). The number of white(W) pixels in the east region is 17. The number of cyan (C) pixels inthe east region is 4. The number of magenta (M) pixels in the eastregion is 0. FIGS. 3A-B, collectively, show the North, South, East andWest regions of the window of FIG. 2.

In FIG. 4A, the 7×7 window 200 of FIG. 2 is shown divided along adiagonal from the lower left corner R₆C₀ to the upper right corner R₀C₆.Northwest region 402 is where pixels have a row/column index where(R_(x)+C_(y)<6). The number of white (W) pixels in the northwest regionis 2. The number of cyan (C) pixels in the northwest region is 12. Thenumber of magenta (M) pixels in the northwest region is 7. Likewise,southeast region 403 is where pixels have a row/column index where(R_(x)+C_(y)>6). The number of white (W) pixels in the southeast regionis 13. The number of cyan (C) pixels in the southeast region is 7. Thenumber of magenta (M) pixels in the southeast region is 1.

In FIG. 4B, the 7×7 window of FIG. 2 is shown divided along a diagonalfrom the upper left corner R₀C₀ to the lower right corner R₆C₆.Southwest region 404 is where pixels have a row/column index where(C_(y)<R_(x)). The number of white (W) pixels in the southwest region is2. The number of cyan (C) pixels in the southwest region is 10. Thenumber of magenta (M) pixels in the southwest region is 9. Northeastregion 405 is where pixels have a row/column index where (C_(y)>R_(x)).The number of white (W) pixels in the northeast region is 13. The numberof cyan (C) pixels in the northeast region is 8. The number of magenta(M) pixels in the northeast region is 0.

Flow Diagram

Reference is now being made to the flow diagram of FIG. 5 whichillustrates one example embodiment of the present method for determiningan orientation direction of an edge at a given pixel location in a colorimage. Flow processing begins at step 500 and immediately proceeds tostep 502. The steps of the method are discussed in conjunction with thecircuit configurations of FIGS. 7-10.

At step 502, a pixel of interest is selected in a color image forprocessing. The pixel of interest is intended to be qualified as an edgepixel for color trapping as disclosed in the above-incorporated U.S.Publication No. 2011/0243429, entitled: “Color Trapping On A HalftonedBi-Level Bitmap”, by Meng Yao. For discussion purposes, the selectedpixel of interest is the white (W) pixel labeled “X” with a row/columnindex of R₃C₃ located at the center of the n×m window 200 of FIG. 2. Thewindow has been partitioned into 8 regions each corresponding to one ofthe 8 points of a compass, as shown and discussed with respect to FIGS.3A-B and 4A-B. A color is selected for processing. For this example, theselected color is cyan. Pixel “X” is being qualified as an edge pixelfor color trapping and we need to determine the orientation of the cyanedge with respect to that pixel location.

At 504, the cyan pixels are counted in each of the eight regions of thepartitioned window. For discussion purpose, the number of cyan pixelscounted in each region is assigned to a variable: {nC, sC, wC, eC, nwC,seC, swC, neC}, where:

nC is the number of cyan pixels in the north region (302 of FIG. 3A).

sC is the number of cyan pixels in the south region (303 of FIG. 3A).

wC is the number of cyan pixels in the west region (304 of FIG. 3B).

eC is the number of cyan pixels in the east region (306 of FIG. 3B).

nwC is the number of cyan pixels in the northwest region (402 of FIG.4A).

seC is the number of cyan pixels in the southeast region (403 of FIG.4A).

swC is the number of cyan pixels in the southwest region (404 of FIG.4B).

neC is the number of cyan pixels in the northeast region (405 of FIG.4B).

The number of cyan pixels in the north region (302 of FIG. 3A) is 11.So, nC=11. The number of cyan pixels in the south region (303) is 8. So,sC=8. The number of cyan pixels in the west region (304 of FIG. 3B) iswC=10. The number of cyan pixels in the east region (305) is eC=4. Thenumber of cyan pixels in the northwest region (402 of FIG. 4A) isnwC=12. The number of cyan pixels in the southeast region (403) isseC=7. The number of cyan pixels in the southwest region (404 of FIG.4B) is swC=10. The number of cyan pixels in the northeast region (405)is neC=8. As such, we have: {nC=11, eC=4, sC=8, wC=10, neC=8, swC=10,nwC=12, and seC=7}. These pixel counts corresponding to these respectiveorientation directions are shown as inputs 701-708 to the 1^(st) tiercircuit portion 700 of FIG. 7.

With reference to FIG. 7, pixel count 701 corresponds to the number ofcyan pixels in the northeast region (neC=8). Pixel count 702 correspondsto the number of cyan pixels in the southwest (swC=10). Pixel counts 703and 704 correspond to the number of cyan pixels in the southeast andnorthwest regions (seC=7 and nwC=12), respectively. Pixel counts 705 and706 correspond to the number of cyan pixels in the east and west regions(eC=4 and wC=10), respectively. And, pixel counts 707 and 708 correspondto the number of cyan pixels in the south and north regions (sC=8 andnC=11), respectively.

At step 506, the pixel counts for each of the 8 regions are compared todetermine the four largest pixel counts of the eight input pixel counts.First tier comparators 710, 711, 712, 713, perform their respectivecomparisons. The four 1^(st) tier control bits produced by eachcomparator are 715, 716, 717, 718. The 1^(st) tier control bits are usedto select the largest of the two pixel counts being compared by theirrespective comparators by toggling an associated multiplexor (MUX),shown at 715M, 716M, 717M and 718M, respectively. In this example, theeight input pixel counts for the color cyan are: {nC=11, eC=4, sC=8,wC=10, neC=8, swC=10, nwC=12, seC=7}. The results are as follows.

The result of comparator 710 performing the comparison (neC≧swC) withrespect to pixel counts 701 and 702 is: (8≧10)=FALSE. Thus, 1^(st) tiercontrol bit 715=‘0’ (FALSE). 1^(st) tier control bit 715 toggles MUX715M to select the larger of the two values being compared. Thus, theoutput 720 of MUX 715M is pixel count 702, i.e., (swC=10).

The result of comparator 711 performing the comparison (seC≧nwC) withrespect to pixel counts 703 and 704 is that (7≧12)=FALSE. The 1^(st)tier control bit 716=‘0’ (FALSE). 1^(st) tier control bit 716 togglesMUX 716M to select the larger of the two values being compared. Thus,the output 721 of MUX 716M is pixel count 704, i.e., (nwC=12).

The result of comparator 712 performing the comparison (eC≧wC) withrespect to pixel counts 705 and 706 is that (4≧10)=FALSE. The 1^(st)tier control bit 717=‘0’ (FALSE). 1^(st) tier control bit 717 togglesMUX 717M to select the larger of the two values being compared. Thus,the output 722 of MUX 717M is pixel count 706, i.e., (wC=10).

The result of comparator 713 performing the comparison (sC≧nC) withrespect to pixel counts 707 and 708 is that (8≧11)=FALSE. The 1^(st)tier control bit 718=‘0’. 1^(st) tier control bit 718 toggles MUX 718Mto select the larger of the two values being compared. Thus, the output723 of MUX 718M is pixel count 708, i.e., (nC=11).

The results of the four comparisons performed by 1^(st) tier circuitportion 700 are 1^(st) tier control bits 715=‘0’, 716=‘0’, 717=‘0’, and718=‘0’ and four largest pixel counts 720=10, 721=12, 722=10, and723=11. These value are provided as inputs to 2^(nd) tier circuitportion 800 of FIG. 8.

At step 508, the four largest pixel counts (720, 721, 722, 723) arecompared to obtain, as a result of the comparisons, two 2^(nd) tiercontrol bits. The 2^(nd) tier control bits produced as a result of eachcomparison are 827 and 828. The 2^(nd) tier control bits are used toselect the largest of the two pixel counts being compared by toggling anassociated MUX (827M and 828M). The results of these 2^(nd) tiercomparisons are the two highest pixel counts (830, 831) out of thepreviously selected four largest pixel counts (720-721 and 722-723),respectively.

Comparator 825 compares largest pixel counts 720 (swC=10) and 721(nwC=12), i.e., (10≧12)=FALSE. A result of this comparison is 2^(nd)tier control bit 827=‘0’. 2^(nd) tier control bit 827 toggles MUX 827Mto select the larger of the two values being compared, i.e., highestpixel count 830, (pixel count 721 (nwC=12)).

Comparator 826 compares largest pixel counts 722 (wC=10) and 723(nC=11), i.e., (10≧11)=FALSE. A result of this comparison is 2^(nd) tiercontrol bit 828=‘0’. 2^(nd) tier control bit 828 toggles MUX 828M toselect the larger of the two values being compared, i.e., highest pixelcount 831, as output 831, (pixel count 723 (nC=11)).

At step 510, the 2^(nd) tier control bits (827 and 828) are used toselect two of the four 1^(st) tier control bits (715, 716, 717, 718).2^(nd) tier control bit 827=‘0’ toggles MUX 827X to select 1^(st) tiercontrol bit 716=‘0’ as output 835. Likewise, 2^(nd) tier control bit828=‘0’ toggles MUX 828X to select 1^(st) tier control bit 718=‘0’ asoutput 836. It should be appreciated that the output of MUXs designatedwith an “X”, i.e., MUX 827X and MUX 828X, is a control bit, whereas theoutput of MUXs designated with an “M” is a pixel count. The respectiveoutputs of 2^(nd) tier circuit portion 800 are provided as inputs to3^(rd) tier circuit portion 900.

Reference is now being made to FIG. 6 which is a continuation of theflow diagram of FIG. 5 with flow processing continuing with respect tonode A.

At step 512, the two highest pixel counts (830 and 831) are comparedtogether to determine a maximum pixel count of all the 8 pixel counts.In FIG. 9, comparator 937 compares highest pixel counts 830 (nwC=12) and831 (nC=11), i.e., (12≧11)=TRUE. The output 938 of comparator 937 is3^(rd) tier control bit=‘1’. 3^(rd) tier control bit 938=‘1’ toggles MUX938M to select pixel count 830 (nwC=12) as output 941. Output 941 is themaximum pixel count of all the input pixel counts. A quick comparison ofthe pixel counts for each of the 8 regions shows that the maximum of allthe input pixel counts is pixel count 704 (nwC=12).

At step 514, the 3^(rd) tier control bit (938) is used to select one ofthe 2^(nd) tier control bits (827 and 828). 3^(rd) tier control bit938=‘1’ toggles MUX 938X1 to select 2^(nd) tier control bit=‘0’ (827),as output 940.

At step 516, the 3^(rd) tier control bit (938) is used to select one ofthe 1^(st) tier control bits (835 and 836). The 3^(rd) tier control bit938=‘1’ toggles MUX 938X2 to select 1^(st) tier control bit 1^(st)tier=‘0’ (716), as output 942.

As a result of the above-described steps having been performed, a final1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd) tier control bits have been obtained (942=‘0’,940=‘0’, 938=‘1’), respectively. Also obtained is the maximum pixelcount (941).

At step 518, a 3-bit word is formed using the 1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd)tier control bits. The 3-bit word defines the orientation of the regionassociated with the maximum pixel count of the color cyan relative tothe location of the selected pixel.

As shown in FIG. 10, bit ‘0’ of the 3-bit word 950 corresponds to 942 ofMUX 638X2, i.e., 1^(st) tier control bit 716=‘0’. Thus, bit 0=‘0’. Bit‘1’ of the 3-bit word 950 corresponds to output 940 of MUX 638X1, i.e.,2^(nd) tier control bit 827=‘0’. Bit 1=‘0’. Lastly, bit 2 of the 3-bitword 950 corresponds to the 3^(rd) tier control bit 938=‘1’. Bit 2=‘1’.The 3 bit word formed is ‘100’=NW. The orientation of the regionassociated with the maximum pixel count (12) corresponding to pixelcount 704 is northwest. This demonstrates that the method and thecircuit configuration work as shown. The teachings hereof derive themaximum pixel count of regions surrounding the selected pixel while alsodetermining the orientation associated with that maximum pixel count. Inthis example, the orientation direction of the cyan edge with respect tothe pixel labeled “X” is primarily northwest. In this embodiment,further processing stops. In another embodiment, a next pixel and/or anext color are selected and the process repeats.

It should be appreciated that the flow diagrams hereof are illustrative.One or more of the operative steps illustrated in the flow diagram maybe performed in a differing order. Other operations, for example, may beadded, modified, enhanced, condensed, integrated, or consolidated. Suchvariations are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.All or portions of the flow diagrams may be implemented partially orfully in hardware in conjunction with machine executable instructions.

Example Special Purpose Computer

Reference is now being made to FIG. 11 which illustrates a block diagramof one example special purpose computer for implementing one or moreaspects of the present method as described with respect to the flowdiagrams of FIGS. 5 and 6, and the circuit diagram of FIGS. 7-10. Such aspecial purpose processor is capable of executing machine executableprogram instructions and may comprise any of a micro-processor,micro-controller, ASIC, electronic circuit, or any combination thereof.

In FIG. 11, communications bus 1102 is in communication with a centralprocessing unit (CPU) 1104 capable of executing machine readable programinstructions for performing any of the calculations, comparisons,logical operations, and other program instructions for performing any ofthe steps described above with respect to the flow diagrams hereof.Processor 1104 is in communication with memory (ROM) 1106 and memory(RAM) 1108 which, collectively, constitute example storage devices. Suchmemory may be used to store machine readable program instructions andother program data and results to sufficiently carry out any of thefunctionality described herein. Disk controller 1110 interfaces with oneor more storage devices 1114 which may comprise external memory, zipdrives, flash memory, USB drives, or other devices such as CD-ROM drive1112 and floppy drive 1116. Storage device stores machine executableprogram instructions for executing the methods hereof. Such storagedevices may be used to implement a database wherein various records arestored. Display interface 1118 effectuates the display of information ondisplay 1120 in various formats such as, for instance, audio, graphic,text, and the like. Interface 1124 effectuates a communication viakeyboard 1126 and mouse 1128, collectively via a graphical userinterface. Such a graphical user interface is useful for a user to enterinformation about any of the displayed information in accordance withvarious embodiments hereof. Communication with external devices mayoccur using example communication port(s) 1122. Such ports may be placedin communication with any of the example networks shown and describedherein, such as the Internet or an intranet, either by direct (wired)link or wireless link. Example communication ports include modems,network cards such as an Ethernet card, routers, a PCMCIA slot and card,USB ports, and the like, capable of transferring data from one device toanother. Software and data is transferred via the communication ports inthe form of signals which may be any of digital, analog,electromagnetic, optical, infrared, or other signals capable of beingtransmitted and/or received by the communications interface. Suchsignals may be implemented using, for example, a wire, cable, fiberoptic, phone line, cellular link, RF, or other signal transmission meanspresently known in the arts or which have been subsequently developed.

It will be appreciated that the above-disclosed and other features andfunctions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into manyother different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen orunanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvementstherein may become apparent and/or subsequently made by those skilled inthe art which are also intended to be encompassed by the followingclaims. Accordingly, the embodiments set forth above are considered tobe illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the above-describedembodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope ofthe invention. The teachings hereof can be implemented in hardware orsoftware using any known or later developed systems, structures,devices, and/or software by those skilled in the applicable art withoutundue experimentation from the functional description provided hereinwith a general knowledge of the relevant arts. Moreover, the methodshereof may be partially or fully implemented in software using object orobject-oriented software development environments that provide portablesource code that can be used on a variety of computer, workstation,server, network, or other hardware platforms. One or more of thecapabilities hereof can be emulated in a virtual environment as providedby an operating system, specialized programs or leverage off-the-shelfcomputer graphics software such as that in Windows, Java, or from aserver or hardware accelerator or other image processing devices.

One or more aspects of the methods described herein are intended to beincorporated in an article of manufacture, including one or morecomputer program products, having computer usable or machine readablemedia. The article of manufacture may be included on a storage devicereadable by a machine architecture embodying executable programinstructions capable of performing the methodology described herein. Thearticle of manufacture may be included as part of a xerographic system,an operating system, a plug-in, or may be shipped, sold, leased, orotherwise provided separately either alone or as part of an add-on,update, upgrade, or product suite. It will be appreciated that variousof the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternativesthereof, may be combined into other systems or applications.

Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives,modifications, variations, or improvements therein may become apparentand/or subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are alsointended to be encompassed by the following claims. Accordingly, theembodiments set forth above are considered to be illustrative and notlimiting. Various changes to the above-described embodiments may be madewithout departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Theteachings of any printed publications including patents and patentapplications, are each separately hereby incorporated by reference intheir entirety.

What is claimed is:
 1. A circuit for determining an orientationdirection of a color edge at a pixel location in a color image, saidsystem comprising: a first tier of circuitry receiving, as input, eightpixel counts each comprising a total number of pixels of a color in aregion of a window centered on a selected pixel in a bitmap of ahalftoned color image, said first tier circuit generating, as output,four largest pixel counts of said eight input pixel counts and four1^(st) tier control bits used to select said four largest pixel counts;a second tier of circuitry receiving, as input, said four 1^(st) tiercontrol bits and said four largest pixel counts, said second tiercircuit generating, as output, two 2^(nd) tier control bits used toselect two of the highest pixel counts of said four largest pixelcounts, and to select two of said four 1^(st) tier control bits; and athird tier of circuitry receiving, as input, said two selected highestpixel counts, two of said selected 1^(st) tier control bits, and two ofsaid selected 2^(nd) tier control bits, said third tier of circuitrygenerating, as output, a 3^(rd) tier control bit used to select one ofsaid two selected 1^(st) tier control bits, one of said two 2^(nd) tiercontrol bits, and a maximum pixel count of said two highest pixelcounts, said selected 1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd) tier control bitscomprising a 3-bit word which defines an orientation direction of saidcolor edge.
 2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said first tier circuitcomprises four comparators and four multiplexors, each comparatorcomparing two of said eight total pixel counts, each comparatorgenerating, as a result of said comparison, a 1^(st) tier control bitused to select a larger of two pixel counts using one of saidmultiplexors.
 3. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said second tiercircuit comprises two comparators and four multiplexors, each comparatorcomparing two of said four input pixel counts selected by said firsttier circuit, each comparator generating, as a result of saidcomparison, a 2^(nd) tier control bit used to select a highest of saidtwo input larger pixel counts using a first two of said multiplexors andto select two of said four 1^(st) tier control bits using a second twoof said multiplexors.
 4. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said third tiercircuit comprises a comparator and two multiplexors, said comparatorcomparing two of said highest pixels counts selected by said second tiercircuit, said comparator generating, as a result of said comparison, a3^(rd) tier control bit used to select a maximum pixel count for all ofsaid regions, and to select one of said two selected 1^(st) tier controlbits, and one of said two selected 2^(nd) tier control bits.
 5. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein said orientation directions associated withsaid 3-bit word comprises: ‘000’=N, ‘001’=S, ‘010’=W, ‘011’=E, ‘100’=NW,‘101’=SE, ‘110’=SW, and ‘111’=NE.
 6. A computer implemented method fordetermining an orientation direction of a color edge at a pixel locationin a color image, the method comprising: receiving a plurality of pixelcounts, each pixel count comprising a total number of pixels of a colorin a region of a window centered on a selected pixel in a bitmap of acolor image, each of said regions being associated with an orientationdirection relative to said selected pixel; comparing each of said pixelcounts for each of said regions to determine a maximum pixel count, aresult of each of said comparisons producing a 1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd)tier control bit; and forming a 3-bit word using said 1^(st), 2^(nd) and3^(rd) tier control bits, said 3-bit word defining an orientationdirection of a color edge wherein said selected pixel resides.
 7. Thecomputer implemented method of claim 6, wherein each of said regions hasa unique orientation directions comprising: {N, E, S, W, NE, SW, NW,SE}.
 8. The computer implemented method of claim 6, wherein comparingeach of said pixel counts for each of said regions comprises: comparingpixel counts for each of four pairs of regions, each of said comparisongenerating a 1^(st) tier control bit used to select a largest pixelcount for each compared pair; comparing said four largest pixel counts,a result of each comparison producing a 2^(nd) tier control bit used toselect a highest pixel count for each pair; and comparing said twohighest pixel counts together, a result of said comparison producing a3^(rd) tier control bit used to select a maximum pixel count of all ofsaid received plurality of pixel counts.
 9. The computer implementedmethod of claim 8, further comprising: using each of said two 2^(nd)tier control bits to select two of said four 1^(st) tier control bits;and using said 3^(rd) tier control bit to select one of said two 1^(st)tier control bits and one of said two 2^(nd) tier control bits.
 10. Thecomputer implemented method of claim 8, wherein each of said four pairsof regions have orientation directions that are diametrically opposedcomprising: <N,S>, <E,W>, <NE,SW>, and <SE,NW>.
 11. The computerimplemented method of claim 6, wherein said 3-bit word defining saidorientation directions comprises: ‘000’=N, ‘001’=S, ‘010’=W, ‘011’=E,‘100’=NW, ‘101’=SE, ‘110’=SW, and ‘111’=NE.
 12. A system for determiningan orientation direction of a color edge at a pixel location in a colorimage, the system comprising: a memory; a storage medium for storingdata; and a processor in communication with said memory and said storagemedium, said processor executing machine readable instructions forperforming: receiving a plurality of pixel counts, each pixel countcomprising a total number of pixels of a color in a region of a windowcentered on a selected pixel in a bitmap of a color image, each of saidregions being associated with an orientation direction relative to saidselected pixel; comparing pixel counts for each of four pairs ofregions, a result of each comparison producing a 1^(st) tier control bitused to select a largest pixel count for each pair; comparing said fourlargest pixel counts, a result of each comparison producing a 2^(nd)tier control bit used to select a highest pixel count for each pair;comparing said two highest pixel counts together, a result of saidcomparison producing a 3^(rd) tier control bit; using each of said two2^(nd) tier control bits to select two of said four 1^(st) tier controlbits; using said 3^(rd) tier control bit to select one of said two1^(st) tier control bits; using said 3^(rd) tier control bit to selectone of said two 2^(nd) tier control bits; and using said selected1^(st), 2^(nd) and 3^(rd) tier control bits to form a 3-bit word whichdefines the orientation direction for said color edge.
 13. The system ofclaim 12, wherein each of said eight regions has a unique orientationdirections obtained from the set comprising: {N, E, S, W, NE, SW, NW,SE}.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein each of said four pairs ofregions have orientation directions that are diametrically opposed,comprising: <N,S>, <E,W>, <NE,SW>, and <SE,NW>.
 15. The system of claim12, wherein said 3-bit word defining said orientation directionscomprises: ‘000’=N, ‘001’=S, ‘010’=W, ‘011’=E, ‘100’=NW, ‘101’=SE,‘110’=SW, and ‘111’=NE.